DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM OF ACHIEVED STUDENTS USING WEIGHTED PRODUCT METHOD

Dewi Rahayu(1), Siti Mukodimah(2),


(1) Departement of Information System, STMIK Pringsewu, Lampung
(2) Departement of Information System, STMIK Pringsewu, Lampung
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia No. 12 of 2012 that part of the national education system has a strategic role in educating the life of the nation. Students are people who are trying to develop themselves through the process of education on the path, level and type of education. The Weighted Product method is chosen because the method is solved by using multiplication to connect the value of the attribute, where the value must be raised with the attribute weight value in question. Criteria that have been determined include: average value, discipline, attendance, extracurricular, and Non-Academic. The results of this study there are 6 alternatives, obtained the value of Agus = 0.1618 as the student with the lowest value and the value of Intan = 0.1748 as the best student

Keywords


Decision Support System, Weighted Product, Student Achievement

References


Undang-Undang RI, “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi,” Undang. Pendidik. TINGGI, hal. 1–97, 2012.

M. Muslihudin, R. Fitri Andriyanti, S. Mukodimah, P. Sistem Informasi, dan S. Pringsewu Lampung, “Implementasi Metode Weighted Product Menentukan Beasiswa Bidik Misi Stmik Pringsewu,” Jatisi, vol. 4, no. 2, 2018.

Muhammad Faisal, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Siswa Berprestasi di SMK PGRI 3 Malang Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product ( WP ),” J. Inf. Technol., vol. 5, no. Juni, hal. 1–8, 2017.

A. D. Susanti, M. Muslihudin, dan S. Hartati, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Perankingan Calon Siswa Baru Jalur Undangan Menggunakan Simple Additive Weighting ( Studi Kasus : SMK Bumi Nusantara Wonosobo ),” SEMNASTEKNOMEDIA, vol. 5, no. 1, hal. 37–42, 2017.

Kusrini, Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, Ed. 1. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi Yogyakarta, 2007.

B. E. Turban, J. E. Aronson, dan T. Liang, Decision Support System and Intelegent System, 7th Ed. Ji. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi Yogyakarta, 2005.

E. Turban, J. E. Aronson, dan T.-P. Liang, “Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems,” Decis. Support Syst. Intell. Syst., vol. 7, hal. 867, 2007.

E. Turban, R. Sharda, dan D. Delen, Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems. Chapter 6 Artificial Neural Networks for Data Mining, vol. 8th. 2007.

S. Kusumadewi, S. Hartati, A. Harjoko, dan Retanto Wardoyo, Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2013.

J. Y. Pak, V. V. Thai, dan G. T. Yeo, “Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Evaluating Intangible Resources Affecting Port Service Quality,” Asian J. Shipp. Logist., vol. 31, no. 4, hal. 459–468, 2015.

M. H. Aghdaie, S. H. Zolfani, dan E. K. Zavadskas, “Synergies of Data Mining and Multiple Attribute Decision Making,” in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 110, hal. 767–776.

T. Ahamad Kumaidi, Umi Latifah, Rinawati, “Implementasi Weighted Product Pengklasifikasian Lahan Pertanian,” J. Ilmu Komput., vol. 4, no. 1, hal. 13–18, 2018.

I. T. Dinar Mahdalena, Mungin Eddy Wibowo, “Pengembangan Modul Bimbingan Karir Berbasis Multimedia Interaktif Untuk Meningkatkan Kematangan Karir Siswa,” J. Bimbing. Konseling, vol. 2, no. 1, hal. 1–9, 2013.

Basri, “Metode Weightd Product ( WP ) Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa Prestasi,” Insypro, vol. 2, no. 1, hal. 1–6, 2017.

A. D. W. KIisworo, “Model Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode Fmadm Untuk Seleksi Beasiswa A-PPA Dan Bbp-Ppa Pada Perguruan Tinggi,” hal. 1–6, 2017.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 93 times
PDF Download : 33 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.